Features

Oh Lawds!  I has a Blackberry and a free meal!

The Producer. The Moocher. The Looter.

Oh Lawds!  I has a Blackberry and a free meal!

Oh Lawds! I has a Blackberry and a free meal!

In this country, we can all be put into one of three categories in terms of one’s personal contribution. You’re either a producer, a looter, or a moocher. Let us define the terms and let you figure out where you stand. For the record, I cannot claim the producer/moocher/looter notion. I will claim the solution for said problems, however.

The Producer.

The Producer is an individual who is employed, if both able and willing. Times are tough for many that are out of work. The producer may be out of work, but is actively seeking employment and not enjoying a minute of not earning a living. The producer’s children have never taken a bite of a free breakfast or lunch at school without the producer doing everything they could to quickly end the embarrassment and personal shame for having done so. They have never had their child’s daycare subsidized. They have never gone on food stamps with the intention of it becoming a lifestyle. They probably decided to get a second/third job or sold off things they don’t need to survive. The producer’s numbers are dwindling.

The Moocher.

The moocher is the person in front of you at the grocery store with expensive footwear and/or a designer purse trying to refinance an Escalade. They feel like free meals for their *many* children at school is a birthright. They work sparingly, if at all. If subsidized housing is available, they’re in it. Nothing is their fault if you ask them. They might have tried to go to college, but it won’t be on their dime. The world owes them a living because they simply cannot help themselves without having to suffer the indignity of missing Maury Povich.

The Looter.

The looter is the smallest portion of the three, but is the most important piece of this puzzle as far as the process being able to continue. Quite simply, the looter is the elected and/or appointed officials in our government who facilitate the looting of the producer’s wages and give them to the moocher. We can quibble about what percentage of this and that goes to what government entity, but the fact is people that refuse to work and stop having children in the name of personal responsibility have no reason to stop so long as the looter continues to reward said behaviors.

My solution? Weighted disenfranchisement.

What?

If you were a moocher and knew which politicians/looters support continued looting from the producers, you would vote for the looters who could give you biggest slice of the producer’s pie. In other words, you would effectively vote yourself a pay raise.

Less work + More money = Helluva deal!

Here’s how we could put a stop the bleeding. We need to diminish the amount each moocher’s vote counts. The perfect vote would equal 1.0 votes. This is a person who works and pays taxes (on time) and does not milk the government/producer of entitlements. I’m not talking about standard things like street lights, national defense and city parks. Everyone enjoys those perks.

Everyone starts with 1.0 votes and is subject to losing a percentage of their vote.

Here’s a few suggestions…

If you are on either food stamps, WIC, subsidized daycare, subsidized housing, welfare, dependent health/dental care for more than 20% of a year’s time, then your vote goes to 0.5%.

For every child you have beyond one, deduct an additional 0.1%. This does not apply solely to the (mostly) women stuck raising these children, if it has been determined you have fathered any children in said situation(s), you will receive an equal penalty to that of your former partner no matter how many children they have. However, if you are financially and morally capable (clean rap sheet), you will have the right to gain custody away from the irresponsible party who has your child. After all, ovaries provide no guarantee of superior parenting abilities.

There are exceptions… If you are a legal guardian of a child/children you did not produce and have been charged with their care due to you being a responsible individual, you would be exempt from penalty. Hey, it ain’t your fault your a good person. I would also provide full to partial exceptions to those disabled by non-preventable disease and/or conditions. Example: breast cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, leukemia. Retired individuals would be exempted based on if they worked or were part of a household that didn’t abuse the entitlement system prior to reaching retirement age.

We’ve got to do something to obstruct the cycle of dependency in this country. We’re on a slippery slope, and if we don’t get some tread under our feet soon, we’re gonna slide to a place from which we may never be able to get our asses unstuck. Let’s put a HUGE dent in the looter’s ability to provide a payroll to the moochers.

I hope that somewhere, Atlas is shrugging in agreement.

stephanie-courtney-progressive-insurance-girl

Would you do?… The Progressive Insurance Girl

The goofy girl on the progressive insurance commercial is none other than Stephanie Courtney. The question to the Couch Pirates and our fans is… Would you do Stephanie Courtney?

waldo

The Best Day I Ever Had

waldoI haven’t really posted anything lately. Had I not been busy being lazy, I would/should have posted something about how it’s awesome that Uncle Teddy died. Maybe I could mentioned how ACORN has been figuring out ways to get prostitutes home loans so they can bring underage illegal aliens to work in makeshift brothels.

No, I will simply talk about the most fun I’ve had in one single day.

In about 2002 I met a girl I had messed around with was then the recent past. She probably would have liked to date, but since I don’t like spending money on broads that option was off the table. I met her at her job, followed her to house. Upon arrival, I banged her. I then took a shower and was close to leaving when she suggested getting something to eat.

At this point I figured it would be OK to get something, as long as it involved a drive-thru. She wasn’t all that great looking, but she allowed me to stick my penis in her, which is a quality I greatly value in a woman. She drove, and insisted on paying.

Hard to argue with that logic.

Upon the return to her place (never do it at your own place unless you have a temporary residence), we ate what we had ordered. Then, I banged her again, left, and never talked to her in person again. It worked out for both of us.

It was awesome.

This video has nothing to do with that story, but it’s amazing. Watch it once, then watch it again and you’ll see that it gets better as you learn the dance and some of the lyrics he’s singing.

taryn_tarrell_014

Dr Octogon Brings the Squared-Circle: State of Wrestling 08/07/09 Edition

The site was having some editing issues so I got behind a but this week, so here we go from ECW on Tuesday.
taryn_tarrell_014
ECW 08/04/09
ECW was hit and miss tonight. It started out with some piss poor banter between Zak Ryder, Shelton Benjamin and Abraham Washington on the terrible Abraham Washington show. Anyone else think it is stupid this dill-hole had been called up for a month and still has not wrestled? They didn’t really need this situation to spark a feud between Ryder and Benjamin. I guess this also cuts Tyler Reks out of his feud with Ryder. Later, they had a goofy Hurricane segment but it gave me an excuse to see GM Tiffany. My favorite segment of the night was Goldust and Sheamus. They mostly had a very traditional mat wrestling contest with Sheamus finishing from a normal move instead of a finisher. Very old school. I like the dynamic they have working ECW with the veteran stars, Christian, Regal, Dreamer, Goldust, capable of training and guiding the young stars in a real setting. The Main Event was the Christian vs Dreamer ECW Championship match under extreme rules. Meh, as far as hardcore matches go, this was pretty tame. One aspect of the Dreamer/Christian/Swagger feud had been the wrestling, but hardcore pretty much eliminates that. Besides, weren’t all ECW title matches supposed to be contested under extreme rules? And a hardcore match involving Christian without a single Con-Chair-To? Come on guys.



C+
klea_05052_280_510271a



WWE Superstars 08/06/09
I thought this was a subpar Superstars for the most part but it had entertaining aspects. Santino for one was great even in a glorified squash match to Chris Masters. In tag team action, Regal and Burchill defeated Yoshi Tatsu and Tyler Reks. This was a pretty good match. Yoshi is getting a decent push and I do not know where they are going with Reks, but Regal and the Burchills, Katie Lee and Paul, had great chemistry as a group. The main event featured Rey Mysterio against Mike Knox with Dolph Ziggler as the guest announcer. Knox once again showed a lot of talent but the match was on the way to the typical Mysterio ending when Ziggler interfered to cause the DQ. I did not really enjoy Ziggler behind the headphones. Either he did not know what he was doing or he was not prepared properly for that role. Maybe he didn’t like Vince yelling in his ear.



B-



velvet-sky-2
TNA Impact
I had been reading about this episode of Impact that would be so crazy and so chaotic because it would feel like a riot. Well, it did in ways and was still a bit of a letdown. The night started off with Main Event Mafia and World Elite, the Eric Young lead foreigner faction, joining forces. Let’s pause to get this straight, MEM now contains their guys, the Nation of Violence guys and the World Elite guys. Because they didn’t say they were just going to watch each other’s backs. It sounded like the same angle they came at Joe with; that MEM was hiring them to be associated with them. So they have a few matches and do some promos building up the idea that it is the TNA originals vs MEM/WE/NoV. This might be interesting if it were not exactly the same thing they did after MEM formed. Anyone remember the TNA Front Line? Me neither really since that arch amounted to nothing. So they have a big 8-Man tag match with Beer Money and Team 3D vs British Invasion, Steiner and Booker T. This is the match that devolves into a brawl featuring almost the whole locker room. However, the brawl had a couple of notable exceptions: Homicide, Hernandez, AJ Styles, and Matt Morgan. The brawl went everywhere, it was super violent, continued for a couple of segments and even had some humor tossed in. All-in-all it was executed nicely and got the point across. However, two things weakened it. Russo or whoever did almost the exact same thing with the n.W.o and since the MEM is already a lot like the n.W.o it all seemed rehashed. At one point during the broadcast, Mike Tenay draws a comparison to the n.W.o brawl, saying even that was nothing like this but that still makes the audience think rip-off. Sigh, is there a broadcast school he can attend. They had some other wrestling during the night, Morgan evened up the series against AJ, Sting squashed Brutus Magnus, Knockout segments not involving the Beautiful People so I did not care, and another mini-brawl at the end that Hernandez clears out with a twirling chain. this is probably all the natural escalation that the Front Line/MEM confrontation should have taken but someone, presumably Jeff Jarret, interfered with Vince Russo’s plans. Now with Jeff at home, Vince is returning to his killed story. Here is the problem: we know that Russo has had major creative control over two runs in TNA, S.E.X. during the early years and now MEM. They are both very similar to the n.W.o, not to mention the new n.W.o in WCW, and then New Blood towards the end of WCW. All very similar to these story lines and all contributing to the feeling this has all been overdone by him. That and the chaotic nature of the last couple of weeks of Impact really didn’t feel all that different from the riot.



C-



maria-wwe-wrestling
Smackdown 08/07/09
I don’t know about this one. I wish last weeks show had lived up to its great final segment because my faith in Michael Hayes is starting to waiver. I am not saying he has lost; I am just saying some of the circumstances seem too contrived for their own good. The last two weeks of shows have been packed with quality and close chances to be great, but nothing ever pays off until the last segment. The show was billed to start off with a Title match between Hardy and CM Punk. The two brawl and the match never starts so Mr McMahon comes out and reschedules it for the main event. He also adds a special guest enforcer, who is pretty predictable if you think back to who was drafted and traded around recently. Morrison has a very good match with Tyson Kid, defeating him but it is a weird consolation for his awesome main event performance last week. By the way, since when did the Hart Dynasty become jobbers to the stars? After the Cryme Tyme “Word Up” segment, Slam Master J gets his first match since he adopted his new gimmick against Charlie Haas. I commend Hayes in trying to keep his old tag partner’s kid employed. Still, I don’t know how long Jesse will be around. I have never understood why Charlie Haas was an eternal jobber either, oh well. Next, Dolph Ziggler wins a fatal four way for a shot at the Intercontinental title at “Summerfest”, that almost came out and said he was going to win on Superstars. It was a good match but we all knew the results. JTG defeated Chris Jericho, meh. Normal build up for the PPV match. The Great Khali beat Ricky Ortiz in one of the fastest matches ever and then Kane came out to remain involved on “time-filler” feud number 2. In the back, their was some crap-tastic segment where Maria explained why she is boning Doplh Ziggler. Really stupid and no need. On to the main event, it is revealed that special enforcer is none other than…Matt Hardy *gasp*. Yeah, kind of saw it coming and from his very first interactions with Jeff, kind of saw the results of the match coming, too. It was a decent match, but Jeff Hardy did absolutely nothing hardcore or extreme, of course. The specter of whatever contrived thing they were going to pull off to keep the title on Jeff really dampened my enjoyment of the match. And then finally, there it was. Hey, we will have Matt Hardy play angry moron. Jeff will be acting like a little bitch, like always, and stand in front of Matt, arguing with him and with his back to the ropes. Punk will slide at Jeff and Matt will obviously see Jeff move causing Punk to knock Matt back. But no, Matt will be angry at Punk and then pull the ref out as Punk is about to win then get in an argument with Punk and then quick count an easy pin for Jeff to retain. Blah, why could they not execute this better? I do not have a problem with Matt counting the win for Jeff, I think their feud is a dead end anyway. I think there were two possible outcomes of Matt Hardy’s return. Matt costs Jeff the title, they have a huge match at say Hell in the Cell, Jeff gets hurt, and then Jeff takes some time off. Or they reconcile, Punk hurts Jeff, then Matt and Punk feud for the title. After Matt leaves the ring, Punk brutalizes Jeff again and it is great just like last weeks. Then Teddy Long makes them a rematch for “Summerfest” in a TLC match. this could go a lot of different ways but I don’t know how many of them are satisfying. If Matt is going to stay heel, I think they should have the Hardys reconcile over the next couple of weeks, then Matt gets added to the TLC, and then Matt betrays Jeff there. He could even become the champion then. If Matt is turning face, they should have them both struggle with it a bit but I do not know where it should end up. I fear that it would just turn into a normal Punk/Matt Hardy feud away from the title and that would be the end of both of their main event careers. Hopefully, before Jeff takes his time off, they can move the title over to Punk while turning Matt face in a believable way. I think Matt and Punk would work a really good dynamic with Matt coming from a place that he could throw all Punk’s rhetoric back in his face.



B-